Either ignoring or political radical anti-mining activists. Interior Sec. Haaland Lying Under Oath

#shorts Stauber: Okay, Madam Secretary, I only have so much time. Let me correct it. Did you either misspeak or mislead in the testimony? Which was it?

Haaland: last week, I should have added the word Watershed.

Stauber: you don’t think that the withdrawal included critical minerals. Again, that’s wrong. You had to be told that there were critical minerals. It was only after the hearing that you made the changes, and today you’re making the changes because you had no idea when Mr. Reschenthaler was asking you. You had no idea that the withdrawal was not in the Boundary Waters, and you had no idea that there were critical minerals that you banned in The Boundary Waters. So how can you as a secretary of material not know where the Wilderness is, and how can you not know that your agency withdrew critical minerals? You own this decision to take offline massive amounts of critical minerals we need for everyday life and our strategic National Security. Your decision, Madam Secretary, is either purely political or ignorance. It’s either ignoring your own agency’s research or a political move to satisfy your radical anti-mining activists. This ill-informed decision has left the United States more dependent on China.

On 4/19/2023, Joe Biden’s Secretary of Interior Deb Haaland was called out by a Republican lawmaker Rep. Pete Stauber or lying under oath during Wednesday’s hearing.

other clips of this published longer video is here: <a href=“https://youtu.be/AlAQXeKgc-4\” rel=“nofollow”>https://youtu.be/AlAQXeKgc-4

Either ignoring or political radical anti-mining activists. Interior Sec. Haaland Lying Under Oath

Key Points

feature=oembed” frameborder=“0” allowfullscreen>

#shorts Stauber: Okay, Madam Secretary, I only have so much time

Did you either misspeak or mislead in the testimony
Haaland: last week, I should have added the word Watershed
Stauber: you don’t think that the withdrawal included critical minerals